The war beneath the war

Happy Sunday.

Quick one before we start. Picture the economic damage from the Iran war. Close your eyes and see where it landed.

I would bet you saw four dollar gas, a Strait nobody can cross, and Tehran running out of money. That is what I saw too, for about six months.

Then I hit a detail this week I had read straight past the first time. In March, Iranian drones struck Amazon facilities in Bahrain and the UAE. A few weeks later the Revolutionary Guard said it hit an Oracle data center in Dubai. The President's own envoy stood up at an investment summit in Miami and warned that the region now carries a risk premium because data centers might get blown up.

So I went looking for what got hit in China.

Nothing. Six months, and not one piece of Chinese AI infrastructure has been touched. Their compute sits inland in Guizhou and Inner Mongolia, out of range of anything in that theater.

America aimed an oil-and-sanctions weapon at China through the Iran war, but China runs on electricity, not oil, so the shock missed China entirely and instead drove up America's own borrowing costs, the very thing funding its AI buildout.

The premise

Two weeks ago the President described the strategy to Axios. We are low-keying it, he said. We are only semi-negotiating with them. We are just watching Iran with its huge inflation and the fact they have no money.

That is a balance sheet aim, and on its own terms it is working. The blockade has cost Iran roughly 500 million dollars a day by the administration's own count. The Pentagon put lost Iranian oil revenue at 4.8 billion by the first of May. The UAE, Iran's second largest commercial partner, cut off all trade with Tehran this week. The sixty day negotiating window expired on the seventeenth and the President told his envoys to stop talking.

Now look at who Treasury has been sanctioning. In April it hit the refining arm of Hengli Group, a Chinese company doing north of 100 billion in revenue with more than 300,000 employees, plus about forty shipping firms and vessels. Iran exported roughly 1.4 million barrels a day before the war and essentially all of it went to one customer. Chinese purchases of Iranian crude topped 30 billion last year.

You do not sanction the buyer when the seller is the target. Sanctioning the buyer is how you go after somebody else's supply chain. The theory of the case is that you raise the price of energy for the country building the only AI stack that competes with ours.

Then go see where it landed.

Today’s Sponsor

The Next Robotics Category Is Agriculture

If you eat food, you should care about what happens in the fields that grow it. Greenfield Robotics is building robots designed to reduce reliance on herbicides: 82 robots in 16 states for six years. Reserve now for 10% bonus shares when you invest.

See Investment Details

^{Greenfield Robotics is Testing The Waters under tier 2 of Regulation A. No money or other consideration is being solicited, and if sent in response will not be accepted. No offer to buy the securities can be accepted and no part of the purchase price can be received until the offering statement filed by the company with the SEC has been qualified by the SEC. Any such offer may be withdrawn or revoked, without obligation or commitment of any kind, at any time before notice of acceptance given after the date of qualification. An indication of interest involves no obligation or commitment of any kind. “Reserving” shares is simply an indication of interest. There is no binding commitment for investors that reserve shares in this manner to ultimately invest and purchase the shares reserved of the company, or to purchase any shares of the company whatsoever.}

Oil cannot reach a data center

Data centers run on electricity. Chinese electricity comes out of coal, hydro, nuclear, solar and wind. Almost none of that grid is oil fired. Oil in China is cars, trucks, aviation, shipping and petrochemical feedstock.

You can make Chinese transport expensive. There is no version of an oil weapon that makes Chinese compute expensive.

Then look at what the oil weapon does reach. Transport and consumption, which is the half of the economy Beijing spent five years writing off. Retail sales grew six tenths of a percent in July. Fixed asset investment fell 6.7 percent. Property investment fell 19 percent. Domestic flight passengers fell seven percent in June while passenger rail held at plus four tenths, because rail runs off the grid.

There was no demand left there to destroy.

How China absorbed it

China cut crude imports by about forty percent between February and June. The Middle East share went from 59 percent to 29. That should have been an economy stopping event. Imports fell 3.9 million barrels a day between the first quarter and the second. Refinery runs fell only 2.2.

Four things closed the gap. Reserves, with roughly 56 million barrels pulled from commercial stocks and 15 million from refineries since May, and the strategic reserve still largely untouched per Vortexa. Run rates cut to the lowest since Covid, which Beijing made possible by banning fuel exports and keeping product at home. Demand suppression, in the form of airfares people stopped paying. And coal.

Coal deserves a minute. China was already converting coal into oil products and petrochemical feedstock at a scale equal to nearly 300 million barrels of crude a year, with naphtha and diesel from coal in Xinjiang close to doubling in 2025. When the war lifted the oil price, that industry's margins improved. The blockade made coal to chemical more profitable, which is to say the blockade helped pay for the thing that made the blockade survivable.

All four adaptations move the same direction. Electric vehicles instead of gasoline. Electric rail instead of jet fuel. Coal instead of crude. Grid instead of pipeline.

The grid is where the AI buildout lives, and it is where China's lead is widest. Since 2021 China has added more generation capacity than the United States has built in its entire history, and last year clean capacity passed fossil. We pushed a country off the input its AI does not use and toward the input its AI does use, in the one domain where it was already ahead.

Where the missiles actually went

Of the 233 data centers operating across the Gulf, Semafor reported three took damage in the March strikes. Three out of 233 is small and I am not going to inflate it. Workloads moved and the system absorbed the hit.

What changed was the price of building there. When Steve Witkoff said risk premium in front of a room of allocators in Miami, he was describing a line item that did not exist in February and cannot be removed now. Gulf sovereign funds spent the spring reviewing American commitments. Insurers repriced. Boards added a diligence question that used to be reserved for frontier markets.

The Chinese buildout sits in Guizhou and Inner Mongolia, and they did not put it there for safety. They put it there for cheap power, hydro in the southwest and coal and wind in the north. A siting decision made on electricity prices turned out to be a siting decision on missile range, and nobody had to be clever about it. That asymmetry is permanent now, and it is priced in basis points on every project finance package in the region.

The cost came through the long bond

Oil went from about 70 dollars before the war to an average of 103 in March, and Brent has run in the mid eighties since. The American consumer is paying 4.11 a gallon, up nearly a dollar on the year, and August is on pace to be the most expensive August on record. Hormuz traffic is at roughly a fifth of pre-war.

That inflation shock landed on a country that already had an inflation problem. Headline CPI eased to 3.4 percent in July, which sounds like progress. Core over six months, annualized, went from 3.3 to 3.8. The ten year moved from 3.9 percent in February to 4.7. The thirty year went from 4.61 to 5.25. The typical mortgage went from six percent to 6.7.

Kevin Warsh will not cut. Coolabah's modelling says the Fed needs another 75 to 100 basis points against 50 priced in. On Wednesday Bessent doubled Treasury buyback operations, from two billion to at least four, aimed at the ten to thirty year part of the curve. The yield dipped to 5.18. By Thursday it was back at 5.25 and he was on television saying Treasury would make a market in long paper.

He also said the quiet part out loud. Some of what is jamming the long end is the wave of hyperscaler bond issuance, and if he were in one of those CFO seats he would issue shorter. The Treasury Secretary is asking the AI buildout to stop crowding the risk free rate, because roughly 11 trillion of American data center construction is planned between 2024 and 2029 and something like 7 trillion of it is debt financed. The long end is both the discount rate on every future dollar that buildout earns and the price of the next tranche of paper.

Set the two countries side by side. The same war that put the American thirty year at 5.25 left Chinese consumer inflation at half a percent in July and drove the Chinese ten year to a thirteen month low near 1.68. The property bust pushed household savings out of apartments and into deposits and government bonds, private credit demand collapsed with it, and the state's cost of money went to almost nothing. Nearly half of all equity capital investment in China in the first half went into AI, most of it from government backed funds.

A country funding a twenty year buildout with debt cannot fire an energy shock without taxing itself first, and the tax lands on the exact line that finances the thing it is protecting.

The part that is working

The part of this I think is well built has nothing to do with China. It is the Gulf.

MGX, Abu Dhabi's sovereign AI vehicle, closed a 40 billion dollar acquisition of Aligned Data Centers with BlackRock $BLK in July, the first deal out of a partnership designed to put 30 billion in equity and up to 100 billion including debt into the asset class. MGX raised 49 billion for its AI fund. One week after Iranian drones hit Gulf data centers in March, Brookfield confirmed its 20 billion partnership with the Qatar Investment Authority would proceed unchanged. Saudi Arabia's PIF was in talks to put five billion into the SpaceX listing. Global SWF counted 66 billion of sovereign money into AI and digitalization last year, Middle East funds leading.

The Qatari fund runs about 524 billion. UAE sovereign funds run north of a trillion. Across the GCC it is close to six trillion. Jacob Helberg, the Under Secretary of State, put the doctrine in public this year: the twentieth century ran on oil and steel, the twenty first runs on compute and minerals.

Trace the circuit. The war raised the price of the one thing our Gulf allies sell. It made them richer. And American policy spent that same window turning them from oil clients into compute partners, with sovereign equity flowing toward American AI right as the American bond market got expensive. Petrodollar recycling from 1974, rerun as petro-compute. Unlike the oil squeeze on China, this one is landing.

The tension cuts against my own argument, so I will say it. If Gulf equity keeps showing up, the 5.25 percent thirty year matters much less than I just spent four hundred words telling you. Equity you never repay is a real answer to an expensive bond market.

The catch is in the fine print. Sovereign money like this almost always carries a condition that infrastructure gets built on the investor's soil. So the strategic yield of this campaign is a rising share of American AI capacity sited where a mid-sized regional power just proved it can reach a data center, funded by partners whose defense budgets are crowding out the development spending that justified the whole thing. We are swapping balance sheet risk for physical risk, and I doubt everybody doing the swap has priced the second half.

What is wrong with this

Start with the biggest. I have read intent backward out of outcome, the oldest error in this genre and the engine of every geopolitical newsletter you have ever unsubscribed from. This war has a nuclear rationale, an Israeli rationale, a domestic political rationale, and a chain of contingent decisions running back to February. Assigning it one design because the effects are legible in Beijing is how smart people talk themselves into nonsense. I am describing consequences with confidence and intent with essentially none. Hold those two very differently.

China's resilience was also substantially luck. Beijing was injecting an average of 1.1 million barrels a day into reserves through 2025 because Russian and Iranian crude was cheap, not because anybody forecast this. The EV transition and the coal to chemical buildout were industrial policy set years earlier for domestic reasons. They were hedged and did not know it.

And for anyone tempted to read the last three thousand words as a China bull case: a surplus is not a strength. A ten year at 1.68 is the price of a country whose own savers have stopped believing the next decade beats this one. Japan proved a glut economy can stay a glut economy for thirty years while its stock market went nowhere, and I have made that point here before. Immunity to scarcity weapons is not the same as winning.

China's real chokepoint is the Strait of Malacca and the lithography stack. If part of this campaign was a live demonstration of what a sea lane blockade looks like, China's answer, cutting imports nearly in half and showing nothing broke, was the counter-demonstration. Both sides ran the same test and both claimed the result. Taiwan proposed its largest defense budget in history on Thursday, up 18 percent and above three percent of GDP, which tells you who is still watching.

What I’m taking from this

The oil price was the obvious place to look for damage from this war, and it turned out to be the wrong place. Crude has been stuck in a range for weeks. The real effects showed up somewhere quieter: in what it costs America to borrow, and in where the buildings that run AI happen to sit.

So two questions stay open for me.

Where is the power coming from, and where is the building? Six months ago a data center in the Gulf was a story about cheap electricity and rich, patient backers. Now it is also a story about sitting within range of a drone. That is new, and most people have not caught up to it.

And who is paying for it, and how? Some of this buildout runs on borrowed money that comes due in 2027. Some of it runs on cash the companies already earn. Those are two very different positions to be in right now, and which one a company is in has nothing to do with what industry it belongs to.

The toolkit is calibrated for the wrong enemy

Every economic weapon the United States has built over eighty years works by creating scarcity. Sanctions make money scarce. Blockades make goods scarce. Export controls make technology scarce. Tariffs make markets scarce. Chokepoints make transit scarce. The architecture assumes an adversary who needs things and can be made to need them more. Against the Soviets, who needed grain and machine tools, that was the right instrument and it worked.

China's problem is that it already has too much of everything. Too much savings, which is why the ten year is at 1.68. Too much capacity, which is why exports grew 24 percent into a world building tariff walls. Too much product, which is why its consumer prices barely move.

You cannot impoverish a glut by making things scarce. You can only make what it already has too much of more valuable.

Look at the record. We restricted advanced chips, and a Chinese memory maker became the largest onshore listed company in the country while their labs learned to train models on a fifth of the hardware. We built tariff walls, and semiconductors and computing equipment added more than ten percentage points to Chinese export growth in July. We squeezed the oil, and they poured concrete for coal to chemical plants and moved another few million people onto electric trains.

Then look at us. Transformer lead times of three to five years. Gas turbines at seven to eight. Thirty six thousand artillery shells a month against the hundred thousand we promised ourselves four years and 5.5 billion dollars ago. THAAD interceptors down from 452 to near 250, Patriots from roughly 2,330 to roughly 800, after five months against a mid-sized regional power. A grid that cannot carry the load we are about to put on it.

We are firing scarcity weapons, from a position of scarcity, at the only real surplus left on earth. It has almost nothing to do with Iran, and it will not stop being true when this war ends.

Stay curious 😎

- John

Today’s Sponsor

Invest Alongside a Manager with a 40-Year Track Record

Private real estate has long been a cornerstone of institutional portfolios, but individual investors have often had limited access to the asset class - or have had to invest through pooled funds and intermediaries.

Lightstone DIRECT offers a different approach. Accredited investors can invest directly in select real estate opportunities alongside Lightstone, a vertically integrated owner/operator with more than four decades of experience and a $12 billion real estate portfolio.

We invest 20% or more of the equity in every offering, aligning our interests with yours from day one. Our in-house team oversees acquisitions, asset management, and investment execution, with property operations managed by Lightstone and, where appropriate, experienced third-party operators.

No blind funds. No intermediaries. Just direct partnership.

Explore Opportunities

^{This communication is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made exclusively through the definitive offering documents. All investments involve risk of loss, including the potential loss of principal. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Any targeted returns or projections are forward-looking statements, are based on current assumptions, and are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results may differ materially.}